Tag Archives: India

Truth on Easter Nimrod Ashtoreth Goddess worship & The Tabernacle you tube video below plus Paganism in the church

ishtar-1

Watch the below

moloch_by_godofwarlover-d36y7n6

 

The Dravidians

 

 

Above Afro Asiatic African Kushite descendants

The Dravidians Sudanese /Ethiopian Indians

Africa extended into what is now called India. The Dravidians or original peoples sometimes referred to as Dalits are Ethiopians/Africans. The term Dalits means Bound and the name may have been given to them by those who enslaved them and put them in a racist caste system at the lowest levels. the Dalits or Dravidians were the indigenous peoples of India or the Eastern Ethiopians or Eastern Africans. 

 

 

8ebe23ed80a0d282f12744cdba48eab7--mothers-love-mother-and-child
Ethiopian woman

 

 

Below pictures East Africa Sudanese people

 

 

Below historical black India

 

 

“The distinction between the black-skinned Sudroid races of southern India and the fair-skinned Aryan races of northern India is not an invention of English colonialist historians; it is a feature mentioned by the earliest Greek travelers who visited south Asia centuries before the advent of Robert Clive.

The ancient Greeks considered the Africans and Sudras (modern Dalits and Dravidians) as belonging to the same `Ethiopian’ stock. `Ethiopian’ was the Greek word for `Negro’, and Greek authors referred to the African Negroes as `Western Ethiopians’ and to the Sudroids as `Eastern Ethiopians’ (ie. Eastern Negroes) [ cf. Herodotus.VI.70 ]

Witness the following citation from Herodotus –

” The Eastern Ethiopians, [ ie. Sudras ] differed in nothing from the other Ethiopians, save in their language, and the character of their hair. For the Eastern Ethiopians have straight hair, while they of Libya are more woolly-haired than any other people in the world. “

” [I]n other respects India is not unlike Ethiopia, and the Indian rivers have crocodiles like the Ethiopian and Egyptian Nile; and some of the Indian rivers have fish and other large water animals like those of the Nile, save the river-horse: though Onesicritus states that they do have the river-horse also. The appearance of the inhabitants, too, is not so far different in India and Ethiopia; the southern Indians resemble the Ethiopians a good deal, and, are black of countenance, and their hair black also, only they are not as snub-nosed or so woolly-haired as the Ethiopians; but the northern Indians are most like the Egyptians in appearance. ” Arrian, `Anabasis Alexandri, Book VIII (Indica),’ Chapter 6, tr. E. Iliff Robson (1933)

Also

The First to populate India

When we see pictures of Indians and India most of us have no knowledge of the Dravidians or Dalits, we see black people but somehow we do not relate to them as part f our family. 

93c95c6077ac6d75af442d4875ea97fe--black-indians-black-people.jpg

The Caste system was instituted by the ruling Aryan class that invaded India. Here a some comments on that history:

“The Dravidians entered India before the Aryans, before 2000 B.C., after passing through Mesopotamia, Iran, and Baluchistan where the Brahuis, a Dravidian race, still live. On grounds of cultural affinities such as inheritance through women, snake cults, organization of society, and structure of temples, some historians connect the Dravidians with the Elamites and Mesopotamians. The evidence of Indian skulls from the Indus Valley indicates that the Mediter-ranean stock became established in north India before the Harappab Civilization came into existence around 2000 B.C.”

“Of particular significance is archeologist B. B. Lal’s contention that the Dravidians probably came from Nubia, Upper Egypt. This theory would give them among other things their Mediterranean features and dark complexion. Lal writes: “At Timos the Indian team dug up several megalithic sites of ancient Nubians which bear an uncanny resemblance to the cemeteries of early Dravidians which are found all over Western India from Kathiawar to Cape Comorin. The intriguing similarity extends from the subterranean structure found near them. Even the earthenware ring-stands used by theDravidians and Nubians to hold pots were identical.” According to Lal, the Nubian megaliths date from around 1000 B.C.”

Here is an excerpt of an essay by Mukesh Paswan:

“Distorted Race Theory”

The term “distorted race theory” in application to the Dravidian movement, which is compared to Nazism and Hindutva. The latest genetic research, which conclusively proves that the Dravidians and Dalits belong to the same Negroid stock.

The poisonous casteism, which the Indian iconoclasts suffering from, is entirely Aryan and Brahmanic origin. Historians have conclusively established that caste did not exist in the pre-Aryan age. It was introduced by racist color-conscious Aryan invaders who wished to “maintain their racial purity” from “contamination” with native Dravidians.

During the Harappan Golden Age, that the Dravidians and Dalits existed as one people, known as `Sudras’. The division between Dravidians and Adi-Dravidians is purely artificial and the result of Aryan invasions, with the former choosing to adopting Aryan culture and submit as slaves to the Aryans and the latter battling the savage Aryans, retaining their freedom in the jungles. Adi-Dravida means – it means `Original Dravidian’.

`Dravida’ is Sanskrit :

Dravida is of Sanskrit origin and the term `Sudra’ and `Adi-Sudra’ are now more in vogue for this very reason. The word `Sudra’ is attested from the Vedic Dark Ages, and this word is of African origin, whilst the terms `Dravida’ and `Dalit’ are much later innovations. The following diagram shows how the Dravidian word `Sudra’ is in fact derived from `Sudan’ :

Sudan           ----> Sudra
(Central Africa)    (Black Indian Caste)

Sanskrit

The word ‘Hindu’ has its origin in Sanskrit literature. In the Rig Veda, India was referred to as the country of’Sapta Sindhu’, i.e. the country of seven great rivers. The word ‘Sindhu’ refers to rivers and sea and not merely to the specific river called the Sindhu (Indus), now in Pakistan. In Vedic Sanskrit, according to ancient dictionaries, ‘sa’ was pronounced as ‘ha’. Thus ‘Sapta Sindhu’ was pronounced as ‘Hapta Hindu‘; similarly ‘Saraswati’ was pronounced as ‘Haravyati’ or ‘Harahwati’. This is how the word ‘Hindu’ came into being. The ancient Persians also referred to India as ‘Hapta Hind’, as recorded in their ancient classic ‘Bern Riyadh’. That is why some scholars came to believe that the word ‘Hindu’ had its origin in Persia. The Greeks who invaded India under Alexander the Great, dropped the ‘H’ completely and used the name Indoos or Indus which later led to the formation of the word ‘India’.

http://www.essaysbyekowa.com/dravidians_sudanese.htm

Ancient Man and His First Civilizations

Indus Valley civilization click for link to article

 

 

Dravidian peoples refers to the peoples that natively speak languages belonging to the Dravidian language family. The language group appears unrelated to Indo-European language families, most significantly the Indo-Aryan language. Populations of Dravidian speakers live mainly in southern India, most notably Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam,Telugu, and Tulu. Dravidian has been identified as one of the major language groups in the world, with Dravidian peoples dwelling in parts of central India, Sri Lanka,BangladeshPakistan, Southwestern Iran, Southern Afghanistan, and Nepal.

The origins of the Dravidian people and language has been difficult to ascertain. Anthropologists are largely at odds. A number of earlier anthropologists held the view that the Dravidian peoples constituted a distinct race. Some argue the origin of Dravidian before the Indo-Aryan invasion, making the Indus Valley civilization Dravidian. Still others argue that Dravidian held sway in a much larger region, replacing Indo-Aryan languages. Genetic studies have concluded that the Dravidian people are not a distinct race but, rather, a common genetic pool between the Dravidian and non-Dravidian people in South India. Some suggest that the British Raj attempted to create a distinction between the races as a way of dividing and controlling the people of India.

http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Dravidian_peoples

dravidian-woman-south-india-the-portrait-depicts-a-descendant-25561840

 

 

Asian variants

 

 

Caucasian describes a race derived from The Caucus mountains and Asia. The caucasus mountains are near to Russia Georgia, Armenia Turkey Iraq and Iran.

Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, who in 1795 divided the human species into five races: Caucasian, the “white” race; Mongolian, the “yellow” race; Malayan, the “brown” race; Ethiopian, the “black” race; and American, the “red” race. He considered the Caucasians to be the first race on Earth, consistent with the common conception of the Caucasus as a place of human origin. The Bible describes Noah landing his ark at a place called Mount Ararat, which was thought by Europeans of Blumenbach’s time to be on the modern Turkish-Armenian border. (Ararat is still the name of the largest mountain in Turkey.) In Greek mythology, Zeus chained Prometheus to a rock in the Caucasus.

Blumenbach considered the skulls of the Georgians to be the epitome of the white race, and he named the first class of humans after the country’s home in the Caucasus Mountains. Blumenbach’s class of Caucasians included most Europeans, Northern Africans, and Asians as far east as the Ganges Delta in modern India. As more scientists pursued racial classification in the 1800s, they relied on Blumenbach’s nomenclature, cementing the region’s legacy in anthropology.

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2008/08/do_white_people_really_come_from_the_caucasus.html

 

 

europe-map-study-39-728

 

 

 

How Europeans developed white skin

When it comes to skin color, the team found a patchwork of evolution in different places, and three separate genes that produce light skin, telling a complex story for how European’s skin evolved to be much lighter during the past 8000 years. The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today.

But in the far north—where low light levels would favor pale skin—the team found a different picture in hunter-gatherers: Seven people from the 7700-year-old Motala archaeological site in southern Sweden had both light skin gene variants, SLC24A5and SLC45A2. They also had a third gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes and may also contribute to light skin and blond hair. Thus ancient hunter-gatherers of the far north were already pale and blue-eyed, but those of central and southern Europe had darker skin.

Then, the first farmers from the Near East arrived in Europe; they carried both genes for light skin. As they interbred with the indigenous hunter-gatherers, one of their light-skin genes swept through Europe, so that central and southern Europeans also began to have lighter skin. The other gene variant, SLC45A2, was at low levels until about 5800 years ago when it swept up to high frequency.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin

Below from https://www.thoughtco.com/genetic-mutation-led-to-white-race-3974978

Imagine a world where everyone had brown skin. Tens of thousands of years ago, that was the case, say scientists at Penn State University. So, how did white people get here?

Evidently, when humans began leaving Africa 20,000 to 50,000 years ago, a skin-whitening mutation appeared randomly in a sole individual. That mutation proved advantageous as humans moved into Europe. Why? Because it upped the amount of vitamin D the migrants had.

Sun intensity is great enough in equatorial regions that the vitamin can still be made in dark-skinned people despite the ultraviolet shielding effects of melanin,” explained Rick Weiss of theWashington Post. “In the north, where sunlight is less intense and cold weather demands that more clothing be worn, melanin’s ultraviolet shielding became a liability, the thinking goes.”

The Penn State researchers also found that Asians developed light skin because of different genetic mutations. So, what does this mean? Have scientists identified a race gene? Hardly. As the Post notes, the scientific community maintains that “race is a vaguely defined biological, social and political concept, … and skin color is only part of what race is–and is not.”

Scientists still say that race is more of a social construct than a scientific one because people of the so-called same race have more distinctions in their DNA than people of different races do.

In fact, scientists posit that all people are roughly 99.5 percent genetically identical.

The Penn State researchers’ findings on the skin-whitening gene show that skin color amounts for a miniscule biological difference between humans.

“The newly found mutation involves a change of just one letter of DNA code out of the 3.1 billion letters in the human genome—the complete instructions for making a human being,” the Post reports.

Still, scientists and sociologists fear that the identification of this skin-whitening mutation may lead people to argue that whites, blacks and others are somehow inherently different.  Keith Cheng, the scientist who led the team of Penn State researchers, wants the public to know that’s not so. He told the Post, “I think human beings are extremely insecure and look to visual cues of sameness to feel better, and people will do bad things to people who look different.”

His statement captures what racism is in a nutshell. Truth be told, people may look different, but there’s virtually no difference in our genetic makeup. Skin color really is just skin deep.

 

See also

Ephraim, Bene Ephraim & Banu Ifran, Kush & Kish & the Berbers.